Online Japanese exam practice

Every so often we hear complaints from certain quarters about "men behaving badly". The complaints go something like this:

Men don't have any right to tell women what clothes they should wear. Men have no right to tell women they shouldn't wear short hairstyles. Some men are exhibiting rude behavior in telling women in public that they are overweight and need to lose weight. Then there are the men who send crude texts, soliciting sex from women they barely know online. And, of course, then there are the angry men. Men who understand gender and sexual politics issues in our time are painted as inveterate misogynists and haters. To this contingent of women, men who come to the Manosphere to learn and read are Bitter Insecure Losers Who Can't Get Laid. In this portrayal, all men are rabid, foaming at the mouth knuckle draggers blinded with hostility and resentment.

Preferences, Not Demands: Setting The Record Straight

First, it's true that men have no right to demand that women wear certain clothes or wear hairstyles in a certain way. Men do, however, have a right to express their preferences. Men do have a right to say "we prefer feminine styles of dress" and "all other things being equal, long hair looks more appealing than short hair".

It's true that Audrey Hepburn, Halle Berry, Emma Watson and Cameron Diaz, for example, have rocked short hairstyles. That's great for them. With all due respect, ladies, if we may be so bold: Most of you don't look like Audrey Hepburn, Halle Berry, Emma Watson or Cameron Diaz. The listed celebrities are attractive IN SPITE OF their short hairstyles, not BECAUSE OF their short hairstyles.

Advertisement

https://www.loveawake.com/free-online-dating/United-States/state-of-Alabama.html?page=86

https://www.loveawake.com/free-online-dating/United-States/state-of-New-Jersey.html?page=86

https://www.loveawake.com/free-online-dating/United-States/state-of-Michigan.html?page=86

https://www.loveawake.com/free-online-dating/United-States/state-of-North-Dakota.html?page=86

https://www.loveawake.com/free-online-dating/United-States/state-of-California.html?page=86

https://www.loveawake.com/free-online-dating/United-States/state-of-Maryland.html?page=86

https://www.loveawake.com/free-online-dating/United-States/state-of-New-Hampshire.html?page=86

https://www.loveawake.com/free-online-dating/United-States/state-of-South-Carolina.html?page=86

Ladies, you're free to wear whatever styles of clothing, dress, makeup and hairstyles work for you and that make you comfortable. Adopt whatever styles you want, have your style choices stand for male evaluation in the SMP, and the chips will fall where they may. Men really don't have much to say about it, other than to express their preferences. Understanding what women want in terms of experiences and authenticity goes beyond fashion—it's about how men present themselves authentically.

A man can wear a bad hairstyle, Coke-bottle-bottom glasses, Star Trek T-shirts, high tide jeans, and attend comic cons. His style choices will stand for female evaluation in the SMP/MMP. And his results in the SMP/MMP will reflect that. So it is with ladies who choose their styles. By all means, do what makes you comfortable. Men will silently let you know what they find attractive and what they don't find attractive.

With regard to the "rude, crude and socially unacceptable" behavior in sexting and in calling unattractive women out publicly, the complaint smacks of cherry-picking the very worst male behavior and attempting to tar all "red pill" men with that brush. Such conduct isn't all that common. If it were, we would all be hearing much, much more about it, and police agencies would be getting far more involved.

The vast majority of men don't sext women (especially women they don't even know in real life). They don't send juvenile sexual propositions to women online. They don't publicly insult unattractive women. If they did, they would lose their jobs. They would be socially and sexually ostracized. Such conduct is also arguably illegal, and probably would be easily shoehorned into charges of disorderly conduct, obscenity, or harassment. The complaints are really much ado about nothing, and are practiced by an infinitesimally tiny sliver of socially unacceptable "men" who in reality reflect nothing of what "red pill" is about.

(It's another story, but unattractive men are consistently made the butt of jokes and called out for their unattractiveness from all quarters. One wonders why it's OK to hold up unattractive men to scrutiny, but pointing out unattractiveness in women is verboten.)

Who Created These Men? The Uncomfortable Truth

But there's something else going on here too. Feminists had a big, big hand in creating these men they now complain about.

Feminists, I blame YOU for the existence of these men. You constantly talk about how "hawt" these men are. You objectify, pursue, and sleep with men like this. These men exist because of YOU. Research shows that women's preferences for male dominance versus prestige play a critical role in shaping male behavior and selection.

Feminism created the idiotic man-boy who sexts crude online propositions to women who then engage in faux outrage and pearl-clutching, as if they don't know where this kind of degeneracy originated and why it exists without apology. Feminism created the socially retarded jerk who publicly insults the unattractive woman. These dirtbags have learned that that sort of jackassery frequently gets them laid. Liberal "progressive" feminist women, Churchian women, and many, many young single women created these men by rewarding their uber-jerk behavior with sex.

Dirtbags exist because women want them, and they reject "good men". These same women who say they want "good men" routinely vilify, ridicule and pillory "good men" as "NiceGuys" ™. As we all know, "NiceGuys" (TM) aren't really "nice" at all, but are "good men" impersonators who stealthily imitate "good man" behavior so they can try to get laid. Feminists, you've seen to it that the "good men" you say you want can't win for losing. When examining why women persecute good guys or reject them, the answer often lies not in the men's character, but in women's mating choices and the incentive structures those choices create.

Ladies, if you don't want dirtbags polluting your society, there's a very simple solution that you can implement.

Stop sleeping with dirtbags. Stop having their babies. Stop expecting them to change. Stop taking them on as "improvement projects". Stop enabling them. Stop transforming yourselves into alpha widows at their behest. Stop excusing their behavior. And stop talking incessantly about how "hawt" you think dirtbags are.

Don't blame "red pill" or the manosphere for the dirtbags in your midst. Blame yourselves. The monster you're gnashing your teeth about is one of your own making.